From 61b58293582a966690c28449e1e4bb3ac06a3dd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Jaust <alexander.jaust@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 13:16:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [doc] updated documentation --- doc/mkdocs/dumux_precice/docs/dumux_precice_coupling.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/mkdocs/dumux_precice/docs/dumux_precice_coupling.md b/doc/mkdocs/dumux_precice/docs/dumux_precice_coupling.md index 43b3a20..6f83a14 100644 --- a/doc/mkdocs/dumux_precice/docs/dumux_precice_coupling.md +++ b/doc/mkdocs/dumux_precice/docs/dumux_precice_coupling.md @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ We plan to do the following The data is then incorporated into the BJS boundary conditions. Hopefully in a smart way. +- Let's try a `shared_ptr` concept instead of the singleton approach! + - Does not prevent user to create more than one instance what is somewhat bad! + - Does not really work. So forget about that now. Cannot pass it properly to our hacky helper functions. + #### Questions In FreeFlow `ffproblem.hh` @@ -22,7 +26,8 @@ In FreeFlow `ffproblem.hh` In Darcy - Do we receive mass flux or velocity? -- How to reconstruct certain things some stuff?! +- How to reconstruct certain things?! +- What happens when `values.setBJS` is called? Is it callable with preCICE running? ### Conjugate heat transfer problem -- GitLab