Dumux Bibtex entry seems to appear erroneous in browser
When clicking through the website, and then on the DuMux3.0 BibTex entry, I noticed that the following appears:
@article{Kochetal2020Dumux,
title = "{DuMu\textsuperscript{x} 3 – an open-source simulator for solving flow and transport problems in porous media with a focus on model coupling}",
journal = "Computers \& Mathematics with Applications",
year = "2020",
issn = "0898-1221",
doi = "10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.012",
author = "Timo Koch and Dennis Gläser and Kilian Weishaupt and Sina Ackermann and Martin Beck and Beatrix Becker and Samuel Burbulla and Holger Class and Edward Coltman and Simon Emmert and Thomas Fetzer and Christoph Grüninger and Katharina Heck and Johannes Hommel and Theresa Kurz and Melanie Lipp and Farid Mohammadi and Samuel Scherrer and Martin Schneider and Gabriele Seitz and Leopold Stadler and Martin Utz and Felix Weinhardt and Bernd Flemisch",
keywords = "Porous media, Multi-phase flow, , Coupled problems, Open-source software, Research software",
abstract = "We present version 3 of the open-source simulator for flow and transport processes in porous media DuMux. DuMux is based on the modular C++ framework Dune (Distributed and Unified Numerics Environment) and is developed as a research code with a focus on modularity and reusability. We describe recent efforts in improving the transparency and efficiency of the development process and community-building, as well as efforts towards quality assurance and reproducible research. In addition to a major redesign of many simulation components in order to facilitate setting up complex simulations in DuMux, version 3 introduces a more consistent abstraction of finite volume schemes. Finally, the new framework for multi-domain simulations is described, and three numerical examples demonstrate its flexibility."
}
So, the title and all names with Umlaute appear wrong. The issues in the author names might be fixed enforcing Umlaute with """ (see !74). The error in the title seems to come from the "-", which is wider than the standard hyphen. A simple solution would be to use a standard sized hyphen (done in !74), but I am not sure if this was done on purpose @timok?