From 967078c6164bd1a58ae76bb9323ca11231a18137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kilian <kilian.weishaupt@iws.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 22:13:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [ccmpfa][fickslaw] Clean-up
---
dumux/flux/ccmpfa/fickslaw.hh | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dumux/flux/ccmpfa/fickslaw.hh b/dumux/flux/ccmpfa/fickslaw.hh
index f378ba5ed2..72db88e22e 100644
--- a/dumux/flux/ccmpfa/fickslaw.hh
+++ b/dumux/flux/ccmpfa/fickslaw.hh
@@ -250,25 +250,24 @@ private:
// use arithmetic mean of the densities around the scvf
if (!scvf.boundary())
{
- const auto rhoInside = Dumux::massOrMolarDensity(elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()], referenceSystem, phaseIdx);
+ const Scalar rhoInside = massOrMolarDensity(elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()], referenceSystem, phaseIdx);
Scalar rho = rhoInside;
for (const auto outsideIdx : scvf.outsideScvIndices())
{
- const auto rhoOutside = Dumux::massOrMolarDensity(elemVolVars[outsideIdx], referenceSystem, phaseIdx);
+ const Scalar rhoOutside = massOrMolarDensity(elemVolVars[outsideIdx], referenceSystem, phaseIdx);
rho += rhoOutside;
}
return rho/(scvf.outsideScvIndices().size()+1);
-
}
else
- return Dumux::massOrMolarDensity(elemVolVars[scvf.outsideScvIdx()], referenceSystem, phaseIdx);
+ return massOrMolarDensity(elemVolVars[scvf.outsideScvIdx()], referenceSystem, phaseIdx);
}
//! Here we want to calculate the factors with which the diffusion coefficient has to be
//! scaled to get the effective diffusivity. For this we use the effective diffusivity with
//! a diffusion coefficient of 1.0 as input. Then we scale the transmissibilites during flux
-// //! calculation (above) with the harmonic average of the two factors
+ //! calculation (above) with the harmonic average of the two factors
static Scalar computeEffectivityFactor(const ElementVolumeVariables& elemVolVars,
const SubControlVolumeFace& scvf,
const unsigned int phaseIdx)
--
GitLab