Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 85
    • Issues 85
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 80
    • Merge requests 80
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Issues
  • #1074

Closed
Open
Created Aug 25, 2021 by Timo Koch@timokOwner

Spatialparams folder

The spatial parameter classes are located under material/spatialparams. I think this historically may have made sense when only porous media were considered. However, the spatial parameters are more general that. With parameters like gravity and extrusionFactor (see #1001 (closed)) that are not necessarily connected to some material, we interpret the spatial parameters really just as (potentially) spatially varying parameter fields.

What would be a better place? common/spatialparams? Or just move the headers to the respective subfolders, i.e. porousmediumflow spatial params to porousmediumflow and porenetwork spatial params to porenetwork and so on?

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking