Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 85
    • Issues 85
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 80
    • Merge requests 80
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Issues
  • #337

Closed
Open
Created Sep 30, 2016 by Bernd Flemisch@berndOwner

get rid of matrixHeatFlux, rename heatCapacity

The 3pwateroil model still uses the method matrixHeatFlux from the spatial parameters. This should be made consistent with the other nonisothermal models, namely, by calculating the matrix heat flux in the flux variables using an effective thermal conductivity relation.

For the same reasoning, one should rename heatCapacity to solidHeatCapacity.

The test of the 2pnc model also still provides a function matrixHeatFlux in its spatial parameters. This should be removed.

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking