Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 104
    • Issues 104
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 92
    • Merge requests 92
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositoriesdumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Issues
  • #691
Closed
Open
Issue created Apr 17, 2019 by Ned Coltman@nedcMaintainer

Staggered Lingo Unification

We waste a lot of time getting confused with terms like "lateral", "normal", "parallel", "staggered", "sub-", "frontal", "tangential", and there are of course a few remaining. Many of these terms actually refer to the same thing. It would be nice to have rules for when each of these words is used, and to unify their use within the staggered discretization and the freeflow models. Is this possible?

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking