Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 107
    • Issues 107
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 99
    • Merge requests 99
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Artifacts
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
    • Model experiments
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositoriesdumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Issues
  • #691

Staggered Lingo Unification

We waste a lot of time getting confused with terms like "lateral", "normal", "parallel", "staggered", "sub-", "frontal", "tangential", and there are of course a few remaining. Many of these terms actually refer to the same thing. It would be nice to have rules for when each of these words is used, and to unify their use within the staggered discretization and the freeflow models. Is this possible?

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking