dumux merge requestshttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests2021-07-28T10:17:47Zhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2733Draft: Resolve "extrusionFactor should be a spatial parameter interface"2021-07-28T10:17:47ZFelix WeinhardtDraft: Resolve "extrusionFactor should be a spatial parameter interface"Closes #1001Closes #10013.5Felix WeinhardtFelix Weinhardthttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2730Draft: Advection Diffusion Model2023-12-13T10:52:19ZNed ColtmanDraft: Advection Diffusion ModelI'm not sure if this is something we would really want, but I set it up for a different module and mentioned this in issue #1001.
This is the same as the tracer1p model with a stationary velocity field, but it does not assume that the ...I'm not sure if this is something we would really want, but I set it up for a different module and mentioned this in issue #1001.
This is the same as the tracer1p model with a stationary velocity field, but it does not assume that the domain is a porous medium. It should solve the transport equation decoupled from any momentum balance.
The test calculates a velocity field, passes this to a spatialParams, then calculates transport on the same domain with a fixed velocity field. To make it interesting, it's a rectangular domain with a circle cut out of the center.
This should produce the same result as the tracer1p model with the same velocity field and a porosity of 1.
If this is something we do want to include, It would likely benefit from a bit of refactoring.https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2707[WIP] RANS for new staggered2021-11-09T14:13:29ZKilian Weishaupt[WIP] RANS for new staggeredKilian WeishauptKilian Weishaupthttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2685Port Darcy-Stokes convergence test2021-09-09T14:21:16ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noPort Darcy-Stokes convergence test* Port convergence test to new staggered
* Add stress tensor for analytical solutions
* add tests for dirichlet, neumann and mixed dirichlet-neumann boundaries in both domains
* test all implemented analytical solutions* Port convergence test to new staggered
* Add stress tensor for analytical solutions
* add tests for dirichlet, neumann and mixed dirichlet-neumann boundaries in both domains
* test all implemented analytical solutionsTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2677Draft: Check CMakeLists.txt files2021-06-08T23:23:21ZHanchuan WuDraft: Check CMakeLists.txt files<!--
Thanks for sending a merge request!
If this is your first time, read our [contributing guidelines](/CONTRIBUTING.md)
-->
**What this MR does / why does DuMux need it**: Update cmake files
<!--
**Which issue this MR fixes** *(opti...<!--
Thanks for sending a merge request!
If this is your first time, read our [contributing guidelines](/CONTRIBUTING.md)
-->
**What this MR does / why does DuMux need it**: Update cmake files
<!--
**Which issue this MR fixes** *(optional - uncomment and add issue)*:
fixes #1044
-->3.4Hanchuan WuHanchuan Wuhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2658WIP Temp/ci debug output2021-06-01T14:20:50ZDennis GläserWIP Temp/ci debug outputhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2656WIP [TEMP] output project var2021-06-01T12:52:06ZDennis GläserWIP [TEMP] output project varthis should never be merged.. ci debug purposes onlythis should never be merged.. ci debug purposes onlyhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2654WIP: refactor-make-install-script2021-07-26T18:41:30ZDennis GläserWIP: refactor-make-install-scriptThe install-script functionality (or similar) is now in bin/extractmodule/util.py
Closes #1021
Closes #1037The install-script functionality (or similar) is now in bin/extractmodule/util.py
Closes #1021
Closes #10373.4Hanchuan WuHanchuan Wuhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2652WIP: [getusedversions] Return last commit that is synced with a master or rel...2021-06-02T12:37:47ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noWIP: [getusedversions] Return last commit that is synced with a master or release branch on remoteIdea
* [x] for getusedversions return last commit also on remote (we may want to make this optional for other uses of the script?, in the current version this never works if the revision doesn't have an upstream branch set)
* [ ] for g...Idea
* [x] for getusedversions return last commit also on remote (we may want to make this optional for other uses of the script?, in the current version this never works if the revision doesn't have an upstream branch set)
* [ ] for getpatches return a patch formatted against the last commit also on remote (or some given commit)
Fix #1021https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2632WIP: Diamon schemes2022-06-02T08:15:05ZMartin SchneiderWIP: Diamon schemesToDos:
- [ ] Unify interfaces of staggered and diamond in common base classes, i.e. prevent code duplication
- [ ] Fix problem with internal Dirichlet constraints when using Box method for mass balance (!2637)
- [ ] Diamond + Box method...ToDos:
- [ ] Unify interfaces of staggered and diamond in common base classes, i.e. prevent code duplication
- [ ] Fix problem with internal Dirichlet constraints when using Box method for mass balance (!2637)
- [ ] Diamond + Box method for nc and ni
- [ ] Adapt vtk output for Diamond schemes, e.g. velocity output for unstructured grids
- [ ] Tpfa scheme for mass balances
- [ ] Reduce Box - Diamond coupling stencils
- [ ] Add diamond testshttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2630WIP: Fix/sequential buckleylev mcworther analytical sol2021-08-16T15:07:18ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noWIP: Fix/sequential buckleylev mcworther analytical solReopening of !2608 which has been reverted in !2627 due to bug #1034. Should be revisited preferably in the light of #869 and !2629 !2628Reopening of !2608 which has been reverted in !2627 due to bug #1034. Should be revisited preferably in the light of #869 and !2629 !2628https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2629WIP: Feature/sequential impes tests2023-12-13T10:52:18ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noWIP: Feature/sequential impes testsRelated to #869Related to #869https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2628WIP [IMPES][test] Use analytical derivatives2023-12-13T10:52:18ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noWIP [IMPES][test] Use analytical derivativesThis test results now in the same solution than the
old IMPES implementation, at least when gravity is neglected.
Related to #869This test results now in the same solution than the
old IMPES implementation, at least when gravity is neglected.
Related to #869https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2620Doc/changelog 34 update2021-05-18T19:39:03ZHanchuan WuDoc/changelog 34 update3.4Hanchuan WuHanchuan Wuhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2613WIP: [angeli] Frist draft of the analytical solution averaging.2021-05-18T09:07:12ZMelanie LippWIP: [angeli] Frist draft of the analytical solution averaging.Related to #649Related to #649https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2612Draft: Resolve "Segfault in McWorther test"2021-08-16T12:19:02ZHanchuan WuDraft: Resolve "Segfault in McWorther test"Closes #1034Closes #10343.5Hanchuan WuHanchuan Wuhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2604WIP [cmake] use correct target for skipped tests2021-05-18T14:00:41ZDennis GläserWIP [cmake] use correct target for skipped tests3.4Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2600Fix/tabulated2dfunction2021-06-28T11:57:12ZDmitry PavlovFix/tabulated2dfunctionThere are two issues. First, we have m * n points, so (m-1) * (n - 1) intervals. The existing `iToX` and `jToY` functions are written in accordance. However, `xToI` and `jToY` do not match. They assume that there are m*n intervals. That ...There are two issues. First, we have m * n points, so (m-1) * (n - 1) intervals. The existing `iToX` and `jToY` functions are written in accordance. However, `xToI` and `jToY` do not match. They assume that there are m*n intervals. That needs to be fixed.
The second issue is the following code in get():
```c++
int i = max(0, min(m_, static_cast<int>(alpha)));
int j = max(0, min(n_, static_cast<int>(beta)));
```
With `x == xMax`, alpha will be as big as (`m_- 1`) even after the proposed fix to `xToI`. But we need an interval number here, not a point number, and there is no (`m_- 1`)-th interval (not to mention `_m`-th). So we need to cut `i` at (`m_ - 2`). Similarly with `j`.
Without the fix, the assertions in `getSamplePoint`
```c++
assert(0 <= i && i < m_);
assert(0 <= j && j < n_);
```
rightfully fail when `x` is close to `xMax` or `y` is close to `yMax`.
TODO:
* [ ] Check which tests are affected3.5Hanchuan WuHanchuan Wuhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2597WIP: Fix/ff angeli2021-05-13T09:39:21ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noWIP: Fix/ff angeliDebugging. Do not merge.Debugging. Do not merge.https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/2593Fix of a corner case in inverseCubicPolynomial + test for that corner case2021-05-05T20:33:43ZDmitry PavlovFix of a corner case in inverseCubicPolynomial + test for that corner case3.4Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.no