Skip to content
GitLab
  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 96
    • Issues 96
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 102
    • Merge requests 102
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Merge requests
  • !268

[upwind] Define the upwing quantities instead of the rule in local residual

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Timo Koch requested to merge feature/improve-upwind-scheme into next Dec 01, 2016
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 1
  • Changes 5

Now we just tell the flux variables which quantities should be receive upwind treatment. The flux variables will decide how to upwind. This way upwind gets more flexible. This is necessary to treat e.g. bifurcations differently where we don't have only two participating volvars but still need to know the physical quantities to upwind from the local residual.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewer
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: feature/improve-upwind-scheme