dumux-repositories issueshttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/groups/dumux-repositories/-/issues2023-11-13T07:36:27Zhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1308test_ff_stokes_channel_3d_nonuniform_diamond fails with timeout2023-11-13T07:36:27ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.notest_ff_stokes_channel_3d_nonuniform_diamond fails with timeoutSeems to be hanging sometimes: https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/jobs/223698Seems to be hanging sometimes: https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/jobs/2236983.8https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1185TabularizedComponent is not thread-safe2022-10-04T14:02:06ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTabularizedComponent is not thread-safeI've `test_1pncni_transientbc_tpfa_caching` failing spuriously/rarely and the error message is usually not conclusive.
See e.g. https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/jobs/120228 were an error is thrown.I've `test_1pncni_transientbc_tpfa_caching` failing spuriously/rarely and the error message is usually not conclusive.
See e.g. https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/jobs/120228 were an error is thrown.3.6Mathis KelmMathis Kelmhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1180New Compositional Staggered2023-10-26T08:13:30ZNed ColtmanNew Compositional Staggeredmentioned in #1115
Implementation and ported tests addressed in !2986 .
New Analytical solution and convergence test implemented in !3044 . Also implemented for old staggered in !3561 .
Troubleshooting branch: `feature/misc_naviersto...mentioned in #1115
Implementation and ported tests addressed in !2986 .
New Analytical solution and convergence test implemented in !3044 . Also implemented for old staggered in !3561 .
Troubleshooting branch: `feature/misc_navierstokesnc` .
Using this issue to collect all of the ideas and progress we have made (the MRs are not organized for this)3.8Ned ColtmanNed Coltmanhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1158test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa (Failed)2022-06-01T19:54:38ZYue Wangyue.wang@iws.uni-stuttgart.detest_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa (Failed)<!--
This form is for bug reports ONLY!
If you're looking for help check out the [readme](/README.md).
-->
**Bug report**
The test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa needs 20 steps on my laptop, but the reference is compared with the 19th output ...<!--
This form is for bug reports ONLY!
If you're looking for help check out the [readme](/README.md).
-->
**Bug report**
The test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa needs 20 steps on my laptop, but the reference is compared with the 19th output in makefile. After I changed compared output in makefile, there is still a small discrepancy leading to failure.
**Environment**:
- Dune version: 2.8
- DuMux version: release/3.5
- OS Version: macOS 11.6.5
- Compiler Version: gcc 11.3.0
- Others:
Output
```
ctest -R test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa --rerun-failed --output-on-failure
Test project /Users/ouetsu/dumuxday/dumux/build-cmake
Start 383: test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa
1/1 Test #383: test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa .....***Failed 1.75 sec
/Users/ouetsu/dumuxday/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/1pnc/1p3c/test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa-00020.vtu
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.!
- Douglas Adams, HGttG
Reading parameters from file params.input.
Computed bounding box tree with 1799 nodes for 900 grid entites in 0.000222 seconds.
problem uses mole fractions
-- Using the default temperature of 293.15 in the entire domain. Overload temperatureAtPos() in your spatial params class to define a custom temperature field.Or provide the preferred domain temperature via the SpatialParams.Temperature parameter.
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.013 seconds.
Colored 900 elements with 7 colors in 0.000518 seconds.
Newton solver configured with the following options and parameters:
-- Newton.EnableShiftCriterion = true (relative shift convergence criterion)
-- Newton.MaxRelativeShift = 1e-11
-- Newton.MinSteps = 2
-- Newton.MaxSteps = 18
-- Newton.TargetSteps = 10
-- Newton.RetryTimeStepReductionFactor = 0.5
-- Newton.MaxTimeStepDivisions = 10
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 1.2000e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 6.2859e-03
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 3.8102e-06
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.2834e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 1.7347e-16
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.034(56.20%)/0.026(43.60%)/0.00012(0.20%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.014 seconds.
[ 0%] Time step 1 done in 0.06 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.07426, time: 1, time step size: 1
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.1265e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 8.3938e-05
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 6.9125e-09
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 7.0832e-14
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.015(44.14%)/0.019(55.68%)/6.1e-05(0.18%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0092 seconds.
[ 0%] Time step 2 done in 0.049 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.1179, time: 2.4167, time step size: 1.4167
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.4593e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 1.4577e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 2.1208e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 4.2510e-13
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.014(45.79%)/0.016(54.05%)/4.8e-05(0.16%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0092 seconds.
[ 0%] Time step 3 done in 0.04 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.1575, time: 4.5417, time step size: 2.125
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.6520e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.1205e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 4.0424e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 9.3259e-14
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.013(43.73%)/0.016(56.03%)/6.8e-05(0.23%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0089 seconds.
[ 0%] Time step 4 done in 0.039 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.19582, time: 7.7292, time step size: 3.1875
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.6662e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.6987e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 3.8616e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.3961e-13
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(41.74%)/0.017(57.99%)/7.9e-05(0.27%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0094 seconds.
[ 0%] Time step 5 done in 0.038 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.2344, time: 12.51, time step size: 4.7812
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.5129e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 3.2645e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 3.8414e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 2.4670e-12
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(44.47%)/0.015(55.35%)/4.9e-05(0.18%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.009 seconds.
[ 1%] Time step 6 done in 0.037 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.27058, time: 19.682, time step size: 7.1719
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.2381e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 3.3690e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 7.9237e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3762e-12
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(45.95%)/0.014(53.87%)/4.7e-05(0.18%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0088 seconds.
[ 1%] Time step 7 done in 0.036 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.3059, time: 30.44, time step size: 10.758
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3015e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 3.0702e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 9.6664e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.0971e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 1.1657e-15
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.015(41.69%)/0.021(57.99%)/0.00011(0.32%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0088 seconds.
[ 1%] Time step 8 done in 0.045 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.35098, time: 46.577, time step size: 16.137
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3471e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3345e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 6.3069e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.1634e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 9.4369e-16
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.015(43.41%)/0.019(56.41%)/6.1e-05(0.18%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.01 seconds.
[ 2%] Time step 9 done in 0.043 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.39514, time: 69.437, time step size: 22.86
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.2485e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 1.8337e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 4.9848e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 7.6620e-12
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(40.34%)/0.017(59.44%)/6.4e-05(0.22%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0097 seconds.
[ 3%] Time step 10 done in 0.039 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.43413, time: 101.82, time step size: 32.385
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.2842e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 1.7489e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 5.3192e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 2.1477e-13
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(44.81%)/0.015(54.88%)/8.6e-05(0.31%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0092 seconds.
[ 4%] Time step 11 done in 0.037 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.47081, time: 150.4, time step size: 48.578
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3759e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 1.7493e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 5.4479e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 2.9345e-13
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(43.70%)/0.015(55.89%)/0.00011(0.41%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0089 seconds.
[ 6%] Time step 12 done in 0.037 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.50748, time: 223.27, time step size: 72.867
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3978e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 1.8186e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 5.9748e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 3.3276e-13
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(40.62%)/0.018(59.11%)/8.2e-05(0.27%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0089 seconds.
[ 9%] Time step 13 done in 0.039 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.54644, time: 332.57, time step size: 109.3
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.4229e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 1.9660e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 6.2956e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 7.8290e-13
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.012(43.12%)/0.015(56.60%)/7.8e-05(0.29%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0094 seconds.
[ 14%] Time step 14 done in 0.036 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.58331, time: 496.52, time step size: 163.95
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.4639e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.2045e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 8.7346e-08
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.3128e-12
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.013(39.48%)/0.02(60.35%)/5.6e-05(0.17%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0091 seconds.
[ 21%] Time step 15 done in 0.042 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.62524, time: 742.45, time step size: 245.93
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.4849e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.6070e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 1.5927e-07
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 4.2347e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 1.5543e-15
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.017(42.04%)/0.023(57.71%)/0.0001(0.25%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0096 seconds.
[ 31%] Time step 16 done in 0.049 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.67486, time: 1111.3, time step size: 368.89
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.4659e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 3.1316e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 2.1819e-07
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 8.1444e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 2.7649e-15
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.016(36.62%)/0.027(63.20%)/7.8e-05(0.18%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.01 seconds.
[ 45%] Time step 17 done in 0.053 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.72813, time: 1633.9, time step size: 522.6
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 2.6992e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 3.3205e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 4.3039e-07
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.6188e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 3.7192e-15
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.016(40.42%)/0.024(59.43%)/6.2e-05(0.15%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0095 seconds.
[ 66%] Time step 18 done in 0.051 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.77863, time: 2374.3, time step size: 740.34
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 3.2737e-02
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.8143e-04
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 2.3822e-07
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 4.4269e-11
Newton iteration 5 done, maximum relative shift = 4.0246e-15
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.016(37.61%)/0.026(62.25%)/5.9e-05(0.14%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0094 seconds.
[ 95%] Time step 19 done in 0.052 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.83014, time: 3423.1, time step size: 1048.8
Newton iteration 1 done, maximum relative shift = 5.3190e-03
Newton iteration 2 done, maximum relative shift = 2.0091e-06
Newton iteration 3 done, maximum relative shift = 4.3137e-10
Newton iteration 4 done, maximum relative shift = 1.9984e-15
Assemble/solve/update time: 0.013(43.82%)/0.017(56.01%)/5.1e-05(0.17%)
Writing output for problem "test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa". Took 0.0094 seconds.
[100%] Time step 20 done in 0.04 seconds. Wall clock time: 0.87, time: 3600, time step size: 176.9
Simulation took 0.87 seconds on 1 processes.
The cumulative CPU time was 0.87 seconds.
Forty-two. I checked it very thoroughly, and that quite definitely is the answer. I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you've never actually known what the question is.
- Douglas Adams, HGttG
Fuzzy comparison...
Comparing /Users/ouetsu/dumuxday/dumux/test/references/test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa-reference.vtu and /Users/ouetsu/dumuxday/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/1pnc/1p3c/test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa-00020.vtu
... with a maximum relative error of 0.01 and a maximum absolute error of 1.5e-07*max_abs_parameter_value.
Data differs in parameter: delp
Difference is too large: 1.54% -> between: -0.000176918 and -0.000174189 Info for delp: max_abs_parameter_value=0.0211596 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.000174189.
Data differs in parameter: velocity_Gas (m/s)_0
Difference is too large: 1.28% -> between: 6.40399e-06 and 6.32196e-06 Info for velocity_Gas (m/s)_0: max_abs_parameter_value=6.44928e-06 and min_abs_parameter_value=2.75056e-07.
Fuzzy comparison done (not equal)
0% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 1
Label Time Summary:
1pnc = 1.75 sec*proc (1 test)
porousmediumflow = 1.75 sec*proc (1 test)
Total Test time (real) = 1.96 sec
The following tests FAILED:
383 - test_1pnc_maxwellstefan_tpfa (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
```3.5Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1153Spurious segfault of test_1p_convergence_box2022-05-27T08:31:03ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noSpurious segfault of test_1p_convergence_box```
315/545 Test #314: test_1p_convergence_box_conforming .........................***Exception: SegFault 0.55 sec
670Chuck Norris has successfully compiled DuMuX.
671Reading parameters from file params.input.
672 --- Solving finest sol...```
315/545 Test #314: test_1p_convergence_box_conforming .........................***Exception: SegFault 0.55 sec
670Chuck Norris has successfully compiled DuMuX.
671Reading parameters from file params.input.
672 --- Solving finest solution (dx = 0.0125) ---
673Computed bounding box tree with 12799 nodes for 6400 grid entites in 0.00150703 seconds.
674Colored 6400 elements with 4 colors in 0.001164546 seconds.
675Assemble: r(x^k) = dS/dt + div F - q; M = grad r -- Using the default temperature of 293.15 in the entire domain. Overload temperatureAtPos() in your spatial params class to define a custom temperature field.Or provide the preferred domain temperature via the SpatialParams.Temperature parameter.
676Update: x^(k+1) = x^k - deltax^kAssemble/solve/update time: 0.0062936(24.8438%)/0.0190219(75.0882%)/1.723e-05(0.0680149%)
677Writing output for problem "test_1p_convergence_box_conforming". Took 0.025 seconds.
678 --- Solving with dx = 10 ---
679Computed bounding box tree with 199 nodes for 100 grid entites in 2.2181e-05 seconds.
680Colored 100 elements with 4 colors in 2.577e-05 seconds.
681Assemble: r(x^k) = dS/dt + div F - q; M = grad r[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03562] *** Process received signal ***
682[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03562] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
683[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03562] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
684[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03562] Failing at address: 0x8
685[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03562] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x14420)[0x7f3da283b420]
686[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03562] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(_ZSt18_Rb_tree_decrementPSt18_Rb_tree_node_base+0xe)[0x7f3da220125e]
687
```
Most likely some multithreading issue. `test_1p_convergence_box_nonconforming` has the same spurious failures.
Here is another one from master.
```
315/545 Test #315: test_1p_convergence_box_nonconforming ......................***Exception: SegFault 0.58 sec
Let's get the cow off the ice.
Reading parameters from file params.input.
--- Solving finest solution (dx = 0.0125) ---
Computed bounding box tree with 12799 nodes for 6400 grid entites in 0.00205371 seconds.
Colored 6400 elements with 4 colors in 0.001878195 seconds.
Assemble: r(x^k) = dS/dt + div F - q; M = grad r -- Using the default temperature of 293.15 in the entire domain. Overload temperatureAtPos() in your spatial params class to define a custom temperature field.Or provide the preferred domain temperature via the SpatialParams.Temperature parameter.
Update: x^(k+1) = x^k - deltax^kAssemble/solve/update time: 0.00675025(21.4533%)/0.0246765(78.4254%)/3.819e-05(0.121373%)
Writing output for problem "test_1p_convergence_box_conforming". Took 0.049 seconds.
--- Solving with dx = 10 ---
Computed bounding box tree with 199 nodes for 100 grid entites in 2.8831e-05 seconds.
Colored 100 elements with 4 colors in 3.9071e-05 seconds.
Assemble: r(x^k) = dS/dt + div F - q; M = grad r[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] *** Process received signal ***
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] Failing at address: 0x8
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x14420)[0x7f44a89eb420]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(_ZSt18_Rb_tree_decrementPSt18_Rb_tree_node_base+0xe)[0x7f44a83b125e]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 2] /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/1p/convergence/discretesolution/test_1p_convergence_box(+0xde397)[0x56271ee9a397]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 3] /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/1p/convergence/discretesolution/test_1p_convergence_box(+0xdea8f)[0x56271ee9aa8f]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 4] /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/1p/convergence/discretesolution/test_1p_convergence_box(+0x103083)[0x56271eebf083]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 5] /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/1p/convergence/discretesolution/test_1p_convergence_box(+0x105f82)[0x56271eec1f82]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 6] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1(+0x1a78e)[0x7f44a896b78e]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 7] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x8609)[0x7f44a89df609]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] [ 8] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x43)[0x7f44a80b0133]
[runner-d5rncghq-project-31-concurrent-0:03605] *** End of error message ***
```3.5Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1150Unexpected interaction of fmt libraries2022-05-11T07:18:30ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noUnexpected interaction of fmt librariesopm-common also ships fmt as we do. There seems to be some strange interaction such that when opm-common is present our unit test fails: https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/jobs/88066. Maybe the opm-shipped librar...opm-common also ships fmt as we do. There seems to be some strange interaction such that when opm-common is present our unit test fails: https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/jobs/88066. Maybe the opm-shipped library is included and there is a version mismatch of some sort.
```
121/545 Test #119: test_format ................................................Child aborted***Exception: 0.27 sec
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Dune::Exception'
what(): Dune::Exception [testString:/builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/test/io/format/test_format.cc:15]: Unexpected result: Hubble's H₀ ≅42 miles/sec/mpc., expected Hubble's H₀ ≅ 42 miles/sec/mpc.
```3.5Bernd FlemischBernd Flemischhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1148Failed test_co2_tpfa/test_co2_tpfani2022-05-03T17:07:06ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noFailed test_co2_tpfa/test_co2_tpfanirtest_co2_tpfa: /dune/modules/dune-alugrid/dune/alugrid/3d/entityseed.hh:78: static bool Dune::ALU3dGridEntitySeedBase<0, const Dune::ALU3dGrid<2, 2, Dune::hexa, Dune::ALUGridMPIComm> >::Bnd<0, ALUGrid::Gitter::hasFace>::isGhost(Dune::AL...rtest_co2_tpfa: /dune/modules/dune-alugrid/dune/alugrid/3d/entityseed.hh:78: static bool Dune::ALU3dGridEntitySeedBase<0, const Dune::ALU3dGrid<2, 2, Dune::hexa, Dune::ALUGridMPIComm> >::Bnd<0, ALUGrid::Gitter::hasFace>::isGhost(Dune::ALU3dGridEntitySeedBase::KeyType *) [codim = 0, GridImp = const Dune::ALU3dGrid<2, 2, Dune::hexa, Dune::ALUGridMPIComm>, cd = 0, Key = ALUGrid::Gitter::hasFace]: Assertion `key' failed.
with dune master + clang.3.5Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1083[test] Gridmanager test fails with Dune `master`2021-10-06T09:31:09ZMathis Kelm[test] Gridmanager test fails with Dune `master`Recently the gridmanager test `test_gridmanager_dgf_ug_parallel` has been failing when run with Dune `master` through CI. Discrepancies appear to include element marker assignments, see the output below. Is this a core issue with our tes...Recently the gridmanager test `test_gridmanager_dgf_ug_parallel` has been failing when run with Dune `master` through CI. Discrepancies appear to include element marker assignments, see the output below. Is this a core issue with our test or just some runtime property that should not be tested (in this manner).
```
Rank 0: Reading parameters from file test_gridmanager_dgf.input.
Rank 1: Reading parameters from file test_gridmanager_dgf.input.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'closure' not specified, using default: 'GREEN'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'copies' not specified, using default: 'NO'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'closure' not specified, using default: 'GREEN'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'copies' not specified, using default: 'NO'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'closure' not specified, using default: 'GREEN'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'copies' not specified, using default: 'NO'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'closure' not specified, using default: 'GREEN'.
UGGridParameterBlock: Parameter 'copies' not specified, using default: 'NO'.
Fuzzy comparison...
Comparing /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/test/references/gridmanager-co2-quad-element-reference.vtu and /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/io/gridmanager/s0002-co2_ug_parallel-element-00000.pvtu
... with a maximum relative error of 0.01 and a maximum absolute error of 1.5e-07*max_abs_parameter_value.
Sorting vtu by coordinates...
Data differs in parameter: elementMarker
Difference is too large: 100.00% -> between: 3.0 and 0.0 Info for elementMarker: max_abs_parameter_value=3.0 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0.
Fuzzy comparison done (not equal)
Fuzzy comparison...
Comparing /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/test/references/gridmanager-co2-quad-element-reference-refined.vtu and /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/io/gridmanager/s0002-co2_ug_parallel-element-00001.pvtu
... with a maximum relative error of 0.01 and a maximum absolute error of 1.5e-07*max_abs_parameter_value.
Sorting vtu by coordinates...
Data differs in parameter: elementMarker
Difference is too large: 100.00% -> between: 3.0 and 0.0 Info for elementMarker: max_abs_parameter_value=3.0 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0.
Fuzzy comparison done (not equal)
Fuzzy comparison...
Comparing /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/test/references/gridmanager-co2-quad-vertex-reference.vtu and /builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/build-cmake/test/io/gridmanager/s0002-co2_ug_parallel-vertex-00000.pvtu
... with a maximum relative error of 0.01 and a maximum absolute error of 1.5e-07*max_abs_parameter_value.
Sorting vtu by coordinates...
Data differs in parameter: vertexData
Difference is too large: 100.00% -> between: 96.0 and 0.0 Info for vertexData: max_abs_parameter_value=3793.0 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0.
Fuzzy comparison done (not equal)
```https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1072Failure of richards benchmark2021-08-20T18:39:45ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noFailure of richards benchmarkThere was a spurious failure of the Richards benchmark in the CI. No such failure had been previously observed in many runs. The job log is attached [job_log](/uploads/de092059c7504c36e9b73073c68aa798/job_log)
Seems to be quite a consis...There was a spurious failure of the Richards benchmark in the CI. No such failure had been previously observed in many runs. The job log is attached [job_log](/uploads/de092059c7504c36e9b73073c68aa798/job_log)
Seems to be quite a consistent failure ~~after !2736~~ when using the new runner on sal.Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1061Disable or fix Python tests in CI for release 3.42021-07-28T10:03:33ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noDisable or fix Python tests in CI for release 3.4The new Docker images enable the Python bindings in the full container (previously untested). The Python bindings are tested if Dune >= 2.8.
However due to a configuration issue the tests currently fail to run/compile. Help is on the way...The new Docker images enable the Python bindings in the full container (previously untested). The Python bindings are tested if Dune >= 2.8.
However due to a configuration issue the tests currently fail to run/compile. Help is on the way in !2681 but this is not going to be part of 3.4. Therefore we should probably just manually disable the Python tests in the CI config on master+release/3.4. Or if the problem is solved in !2681 soon, add the fix to the current CI config.3.4https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1034Segfault in McWorther test (currently untested)2021-08-16T12:23:18ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noSegfault in McWorther test (currently untested)The test added in !2630 fails. Continuing discussion there.The test added in !2630 fails. Continuing discussion there.3.5Hanchuan WuHanchuan Wuhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1026Minimal CI Setup failing tests2021-05-10T12:22:33ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noMinimal CI Setup failing tests421 - test_3p3cni_columnxylol_box (Failed)
427 - test_3pwateroil_sagd_box (Failed)
Probably related to the solver tolerance in the AMG without direct solver backend.421 - test_3p3cni_columnxylol_box (Failed)
427 - test_3pwateroil_sagd_box (Failed)
Probably related to the solver tolerance in the AMG without direct solver backend.3.4Dennis GläserDennis Gläserhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/1025InvertCubicPolynomial test fails2021-05-10T14:35:37ZDennis GläserInvertCubicPolynomial test failsIn our pipeline, `test_math` regularly fails. According to GitLab it failed 4 times in the last 14 days - although I think we have the CI only since about a week. The `invertCubicPolynomial` test seems to be the cause of error, here is t...In our pipeline, `test_math` regularly fails. According to GitLab it failed 4 times in the last 14 days - although I think we have the CI only since about a week. The `invertCubicPolynomial` test seems to be the cause of error, here is the output from tonight:
```sh
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Dune::Exception'
what(): Dune::Exception [operator():/builds/dumux-repositories/dumux/test/common/math/test_math.cc:282]: [invertCubicPolynomial] Root 0 of 3: -7.81946 does not match reference
```
The night before, for instance, it seems that it did not fail. @timok, I believe you implemented this? I haven't looked into the test yet, but could it be that the deviation threshold in the test is chosen too small?3.4Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/985Richards benchmark test fails due to assert in spline2021-02-01T12:29:22ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noRichards benchmark test fails due to assert in splineProbably something with the regularization of krw/pc-sw. The regularized interval approximated by the spline might be too small? It could also be that the assert is wrong. Needs closer investigation.Probably something with the regularization of krw/pc-sw. The regularized interval approximated by the spline might be too small? It could also be that the assert is wrong. Needs closer investigation.3.4Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/980Failing parallel tests2021-01-09T18:48:44ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noFailing parallel testsParallel tests fail with
```
NotImplemented [get:/data/dune-istl/dune/istl/solverfactory.hh:190]: The solver factory is currently only implemented for sequential solvers!
```
for Dune 2.7, did we remove some version checks?Parallel tests fail with
```
NotImplemented [get:/data/dune-istl/dune/istl/solverfactory.hh:190]: The solver factory is currently only implemented for sequential solvers!
```
for Dune 2.7, did we remove some version checks?3.4Timo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.noTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.nohttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/954test_md_embedded_1d3d_1p1p_tpfatpfa_convergence fails, no numpy on BuildBot2020-11-05T16:51:01ZTimo Kochtimokoch@math.uio.notest_md_embedded_1d3d_1p1p_tpfatpfa_convergence fails, no numpy on BuildBot3.3https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/950test_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay fails2021-04-16T10:42:40ZMathis Kelmtest_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay failstest_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay fails for me with gcc 9.3.0.
As far as I can tell both UMFPack and dune-subgrid are installed, the test compiles despite UMFPack CMake guard and the macro HAVE_DUNE_SUBGRID evaluates to true.
The other two ...test_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay fails for me with gcc 9.3.0.
As far as I can tell both UMFPack and dune-subgrid are installed, the test compiles despite UMFPack CMake guard and the macro HAVE_DUNE_SUBGRID evaluates to true.
The other two tests in navierstokes/kovasznay pass but when executing test_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay with params.input I get the following error message.
```
Newton: Caught exception: "NumericalProblem [solveLinearSystem:dumux/dumux/nonlinear/newtonsolver.hh:454]: Linear solver did not converge"
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Dumux::NumericalProblem'
what(): NumericalProblem [solve:dumux/dumux/nonlinear/newtonsolver.hh:331]: Newton solver didn't converge after 5 iterations.
[40442] *** Process received signal ***
[40442] Signal: Aborted (6)
[40442] Signal code: (-6)
[40442] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x153c0)[0x7f0de4a233c0]
[40442] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0xcb)[0x7f0de486218b]
[40442] [ 2] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x12b)[0x7f0de4841859]
[40442] [ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(+0x9e951)[0x7f0de4aec951]
[40442] [ 4] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(+0xaa47c)[0x7f0de4af847c]
[40442] [ 5] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(+0xaa4e7)[0x7f0de4af84e7]
[40442] [ 6] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(+0xaa799)[0x7f0de4af8799]
[40442] [ 7] ./test_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay(+0x150d38)[0x55ec2723fd38]
[40442] [ 8] ./test_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay(+0x31bcd)[0x55ec27120bcd]
[40442] [ 9] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0x7f0de48430b3]
[40442] [10] ./test_ff_navierstokes_kovasznay(+0x336be)[0x55ec271226be]
[40442] *** End of error message ***
Aborted (core dumped)```3.4Mathis KelmMathis Kelmhttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux-course/-/issues/27Failing excercise-fluidsystem2020-10-29T15:35:59ZRoman WinterFailing excercise-fluidsystemThe excercise-fluidsystem_solution a and b tests are failing with the message:
```
ParameterException [init:/home/rwinter/DUMUX/dumux/dumux/io/grid/gridmanager_yasp.hh:107]: Please supply one of the parameters Grid.UpperRight , or a grid...The excercise-fluidsystem_solution a and b tests are failing with the message:
```
ParameterException [init:/home/rwinter/DUMUX/dumux/dumux/io/grid/gridmanager_yasp.hh:107]: Please supply one of the parameters Grid.UpperRight , or a grid file in Grid.File
```
I didn't change something there and the UpperRight is defined in all params.input as:
```
[Grid]
UpperRight = 60 60 # x-/y-coordinates of the upper-right corner of the grid [m]
```3.3Kilian WeishauptKilian Weishaupthttps://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/948test_3pwateroil_sagd_box fails2020-10-31T14:18:25ZKilian Weishaupttest_3pwateroil_sagd_box failsFails on hal with g++ (GCC) 10.2.0
```
416: Fuzzy comparison...
416: Comparing /temp/weishaupt/Dumux_testing_master/dumux/test/references/test_3pwateroil_sagd_box-reference.vtu and /temp/weishaupt/Dumux_testing_master/dumux/build-cmake...Fails on hal with g++ (GCC) 10.2.0
```
416: Fuzzy comparison...
416: Comparing /temp/weishaupt/Dumux_testing_master/dumux/test/references/test_3pwateroil_sagd_box-reference.vtu and /temp/weishaupt/Dumux_testing_master/dumux/build-cmake/test/porousmediumflow/3pwateroil/implicit/test_3pwateroil_sagd_box-00001.vtu
416: ... with a maximum relative error of 0.01 and a maximum absolute error of 1.5e-07*max_abs_parameter_value.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: S_aq
416: Difference is too large: 3.35% -> between: 0.371884 and 0.384759
416: Info for S_aq: max_abs_parameter_value=0.701504 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.371884.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: S_gas
416: Difference is too large: 3.23% -> between: 0.366778 and 0.35494
416: Info for S_gas: max_abs_parameter_value=0.366778 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: mob_aq
416: Difference is too large: 14.05% -> between: 130.979 and 152.385
416: Info for mob_aq: max_abs_parameter_value=467.458 and min_abs_parameter_value=130.979.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: mob_gas
416: Difference is too large: 5.47% -> between: 14871.0 and 14057.1
416: Info for mob_gas: max_abs_parameter_value=14871.0 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: mob_napl
416: Difference is too large: 4.53% -> between: 0.0152723 and 0.0145809
416: Info for mob_napl: max_abs_parameter_value=6.10674 and min_abs_parameter_value=8.86194e-05.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: mu_gas
416: Difference is too large: 3.13% -> between: 9.50177e-08 and 9.20431e-08
416: Info for mu_gas: max_abs_parameter_value=1.77629e-05 and min_abs_parameter_value=5.87006e-09.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: mu_napl
416: Difference is too large: 4.65% -> between: 10.7806 and 11.3068
416: Info for mu_napl: max_abs_parameter_value=1747.3 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.00550324.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: rho_gas
416: Difference is too large: 2.48% -> between: 0.234406 and 0.228589
416: Info for rho_gas: max_abs_parameter_value=23.2395 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0194941.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: x^H2O_gas
416: Difference is too large: 2.93% -> between: 0.00838062 and 0.00813482
416: Info for x^H2O_gas: max_abs_parameter_value=0.999998 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.000610972.
416:
416: Data differs in parameter: x^heavyoil_gas
416: Difference is too large: 1.37% -> between: 2.17444e-06 and 2.20465e-06
416: Info for x^heavyoil_gas: max_abs_parameter_value=2.20465e-06 and min_abs_parameter_value=0.0.
416: Fuzzy comparison done (not equal)
1/1 Test #416: test_3pwateroil_sagd_box .........***Failed 9.31 sec
```3.3https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/issues/941test_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames fails on buildbot2020-10-23T20:19:13ZSimon Emmerttest_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames fails on buildbot`test_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames` aborts on buildbot. I think (but I did not check anything yet), this is due to !2224.
From looking at `dumux/test/io/vtk/test_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames.cc` it seems like the navierstokes-tests work...`test_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames` aborts on buildbot. I think (but I did not check anything yet), this is due to !2224.
From looking at `dumux/test/io/vtk/test_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames.cc` it seems like the navierstokes-tests work, and the KEpsilon-test is the first one to abort with the following message:
`updateStaticWallProperties:/data/dumux/dumux/freeflow/rans/zeroeq/problem.hh:91]:
Due to grid/geometric concerns, zero-eq models should only be used for flat channel geometries.`
I guess this is an easy fix for @nedc or @melaniel
Log excerpt from buildbot:
``` 150/475 Test #132: test_vtk_staggeredfreeflowpvnames ..........................Child aborted***Exception: 2.18 sec
### # # # #
# # # # ## ## # # #
# # # # # # # # # # #
### ## # # ##
Dune for Multi-{ Phase,
Component,
Scale,
Physics,
...} flow and transport in porous media
The H2O-air fluid system was configured with the following policy:
- use H2O density as liquid mixture density: false
- use ideal gas density: false
- use air viscosity as gas mixture viscosity: false
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initializing tables for the H2O fluid properties (20000 entries).
Temperature -> min: 2.731e+02, max: 6.231e+02, n: 100
Pressure -> min: -1.000e+01, max: 2.000e+07, n: 200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Writing output for problem "navierstokes". Took 3.373e-01 seconds.
Warning: gasDensity(T=0, p=0) of component 'H2O' is outside tabulation range: (273.15<=T<=623.15), (-10<=p<=2e+07). Forwarded to FluidSystem for direct evaluation of gasDensity.
Writing output for problem "navierstokesni". Took 1.604e-01 seconds.
Writing output for problem "navierstokesnc". Took 1.692e-03 seconds.
Writing output for problem "navierstokesncni". Took 2.352e-03 seconds.
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Dune::NotImplemented'
what(): Dune::NotImplemented [updateStaticWallProperties:/data/dumux/dumux/freeflow/rans/zeroeq/problem.hh:91]:
Due to grid/geometric concerns, zero-eq models should only be used for flat channel geometries.
If your geometry is a flat channel, please set the runtime parameter RANS.IsFlatWallBounded to true. ```3.3Ned ColtmanNed Coltman