Design the preCICE-adapter to follow the design of the CouplingManager
In terms of usability it might be smart to design the adapter to be close to the CouplingManager
class that the users know already.
What we have to discuss/find out:
-
Is this a good idea (is the design of CouplingManager
good/stable)? -
Is it feasible to reuse the design of CouplingManager
for the preCICE-adapter? -
Would we have to change the name of CouplingManager
intoMonolothicCouplingManager
andPartitionedCouplingManager
or should we go for another approach? (bool isPartitionedCoupling
, template...)
Edited by Alexander Jaust