-
Timo Koch authored
What was broken: The test used philtophob law which used the wrong residual saturations. It went into efftoabslaw with the non-wetting saturation so swr and snr where the wrong way around. It also overwrote the krw/krn function of the material law in use with a quadratic/cubic law. It also defined the capillary pressure negative but then it would be pc = pw-pn. What was fixed: Use the wettingPhase function instead to make the gas phase the wetting phase This changed: - the pw solution as swr and snr were corrected (the wrong way around pw was equal) - the pc solution because it is now positite - the mobilities as they didn't use the real van genuchten curves
Timo Koch authoredWhat was broken: The test used philtophob law which used the wrong residual saturations. It went into efftoabslaw with the non-wetting saturation so swr and snr where the wrong way around. It also overwrote the krw/krn function of the material law in use with a quadratic/cubic law. It also defined the capillary pressure negative but then it would be pc = pw-pn. What was fixed: Use the wettingPhase function instead to make the gas phase the wetting phase This changed: - the pw solution as swr and snr were corrected (the wrong way around pw was equal) - the pc solution because it is now positite - the mobilities as they didn't use the real van genuchten curves