- Dec 15, 2017
-
-
Dennis Gläser authored
This commit affects all properties and member variables
-
Beatrix Becker authored
-
Beatrix Becker authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
This commit affects all properties and member variables
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Dennis Gläser authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Beatrix Becker authored
[handbook] delete old tutorial See merge request !671
-
Beatrix Becker authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
* use correct class name
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
* the test failed compared to the ref solution generated on the old master * the reason for this is the change of how rho in context of gravity is calculated * using rho = 0.5*(elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].density(phaseIdx) + elemVolVars[scvf.outsideScvIdx()].density(phaseIdx)); instead of interpolating the value of rho onto the face made the test pass w.r.t the the old solution * we prefer interpolationg rho, however, therefore the ref solution is updated * using the interpolated rho also decreases the number of timesteps from 8 to 7 (compared to the old master)
-