Skip to content
GitLab
  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 97
    • Issues 97
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 100
    • Merge requests 100
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Merge requests
  • !2490

[test][swe] Actually use new viscous flux in the test

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Timo Koch requested to merge fix/shallowwawter-frcitionlaw-interface-requirements into master Feb 27, 2021
  • Overview 15
  • Commits 2
  • Changes 5

Turns out the viscous flux was never executed because the wrong parameter was set in the input file. After I turned it on the solution changed. I updated the reference. @fwplatzek Can you make sure that the result still looks like what you would expect?

Edited Mar 01, 2021 by Timo Koch
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewer
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: fix/shallowwawter-frcitionlaw-interface-requirements