Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 100
    • Issues 100
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 92
    • Merge requests 92
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositoriesdumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Merge requests
  • !2490

[test][swe] Actually use new viscous flux in the test

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Timo Koch requested to merge fix/shallowwawter-frcitionlaw-interface-requirements into master Feb 27, 2021
  • Overview 15
  • Commits 2
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 5

Turns out the viscous flux was never executed because the wrong parameter was set in the input file. After I turned it on the solution changed. I updated the reference. @fwplatzek Can you make sure that the result still looks like what you would expect?

Edited Mar 01, 2021 by Timo Koch
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: fix/shallowwawter-frcitionlaw-interface-requirements