Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 100
    • Issues 100
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 87
    • Merge requests 87
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositoriesdumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Merge requests
  • !2730

Draft: Advection Diffusion Model

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Open Ned Coltman requested to merge feature/advection_diffusion into master Jul 28, 2021
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 1
  • Pipelines 1
  • Changes 15

I'm not sure if this is something we would really want, but I set it up for a different module and mentioned this in issue #1001 (closed).

This is the same as the tracer1p model with a stationary velocity field, but it does not assume that the domain is a porous medium. It should solve the transport equation decoupled from any momentum balance.

The test calculates a velocity field, passes this to a spatialParams, then calculates transport on the same domain with a fixed velocity field. To make it interesting, it's a rectangular domain with a circle cut out of the center.

This should produce the same result as the tracer1p model with the same velocity field and a porosity of 1.

If this is something we do want to include, It would likely benefit from a bit of refactoring.

Edited Sep 16, 2021 by Ned Coltman
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: feature/advection_diffusion