Level of details for example documentation differs a lot
How easy it is to understand the examples differs wildly based on how extensive their documentation is. The jupyter notebook for the 'analytical function' is very good to read and easy to understand in its format, but I had overlooked it for the longest time. I propose to add explanations of all the experiments to the documentation webpage for 'bayesvalidrox'. Here the explanations can then have different levels of complexity, but would still be easy to find and enable others that do not already work with this package to take a look at its functionality.