Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • dumux dumux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 100
    • Issues 100
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 87
    • Merge requests 87
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dumux-repositoriesdumux-repositories
  • dumuxdumux
  • Issues
  • #904
Closed
Open
Issue created Jul 07, 2020 by Kilian Weishaupt@kweisMaintainer

Naming convention for fluxes

Currently we consider the flow of energy, mass or momentum as "fluxes" within the local residual classes, fluxVars, flux laws (e.g, Darcy and Fick), etc. However, they are actually absolute flows (e.g. in kg/s).

I know this is hairsplitting at its finest but my impression is that the literature commonly considers "fluxes" as "flow of some quantity per area" (such as kg/(sm²)). It also caused some confusion for me sometimes as I first have to look up if the multiplication with scvf.area() was already performed or not.

@all What is your opinion? Are there citable sources which actually do consider "fluxes" as something absolute? Should we bother to rename our stuff for sake of consistency?

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking