- Nov 21, 2019
-
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
-
Timo Koch authored
This implements wrappers for scvs and scvf that turn them into radially symmetric counterparts by overloading the volume() and area() functions. We support three modes: * disc (annulus): A 1d grid is extruded into an annulus or disc In the case of a disc (inner pos: 0) the inner scvf.area() is 0! * ball (shell): A 1d grid is extruded into a spherical shell or a ball In the case of a ball the inner scvf.area() is 0! * toroid: A 2d grid is extruded into a toroid In the case that on grid side is aligned with the axis the inner scvf.area() for all inner scvfs is 0! The grid points all have to be >= 0! We also support unstructured grids and random convex shapes
-
- Nov 20, 2019
-
-
Timo Koch authored
-
This uses the newly introduced fluxtraits to check if the velocity field is stationary. With these changes the velocity output is corrected in the reference solution.
-
- Nov 19, 2019
-
- Nov 16, 2019
-
- Nov 15, 2019
-
-
Christoph Grüninger authored
-
Christoph Grüninger authored
-
Christoph Grüninger authored
-
- Nov 13, 2019
- Nov 12, 2019
-
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
[test][stokes2d] Produces output files with unique name Closes #783 See merge request !1790
-
Kilian Weishaupt authored
[bugfix][staggered] Use value member of true/false_type See merge request !1783
-
- Nov 11, 2019
-
-
-
Timo Koch authored
-
* Change input params such that more features are tested * Test alu and ug separately * Test if it works for zero well radius, i.e. line or point source
-
-
-
If Grid.WellRadius is set, then replace the first angular array entry by this radius.
-
The well radius was a seperate parameter that has been added to all given radial coordinates, which results on different coordinates then expected
-
-
*The angular values are given in radians, so checking with a a value of 360deg did not make any sense *The vertices for 0deg and 360deg are the same but were both added to the gridFactory
-
For the case that multiple values, i.e. r0 < r1 < r2 are specified, the calculation of number of positions was wrong
-
Theresa Schollenberger authored
[tests][2pncmin] corrected source term. Previously physically wrong, units did... See merge request !1787
-
[tests][2pncmin] corrected source term. Previously physically wrong, units did not balance. Updated reference
-
Timo Koch authored
- Nov 08, 2019
- Oct 31, 2019
-
-
Ned Coltman authored
-
-